Vivarium: Philosophy Discussions On Any Subject

I love myself by only holding as true what feels good, and what is moral, in that it does not hurt others.
We first had God, to love ourselves by loving him, by surrendering to his love, and now we have grown, we've progressed, replacing God with humanity.
We are en-lightened, not in the sense of being exposed to light, but to a darkening, a unburdening of self, of Self.
We love self by loving humanity.
This is the epitome of FU self-loving.

My mentor and guru cAnus, a.k.a. iambiguous, a.k.a. chimpanzee, a.k.a. mule, a.k.a. ****...has lead me to a new en-darkening lightness, and one day he will free you all of your bigotry and your realism, releasing you to be, like her, a world changer.

I now bring to you her teachings as I have understood them - they are so complex, profound and genius, I do my best.

I know that I only must believe what does not hurt anyone else, and also myself, because all is subjective, and there was no reality before man emerged, about 5 000 years ago, or whenever man invented, out of nothing, civilization, and socioeconomic systems.
Before that there was no sex, no race, no kinds, no types of any sort, no species, no elements....at least as far as they do not insult or hurt someone's feelings.
There was no evolution before man, and when man invented it, evolution did not apply to him.
As such, species and how they emerge does not affect man, ergo there are no human breeds, called races.
And, although sexual specialization evolved two distinct sexes, this is only cosmetic, superficial, an image with no depth - a superficial avatar.

When you love others, you love yourself through others, and you respect their desire to delude themselves and to live-out their life as happy and obtuse as possible.
Our new religion is subjectivity - God's love now expressed as our freedom to create a reality we like, and we deserve.
Once man invented, out of nothing, society, he liberated himself from reality.
From then on he could identify with anything, at any time, for any reason, which is no reason at all.
If he identifies with a mare and enjoys being penetrated by a stallion, then it is his 'right' to find pleasure in it, and to be respected and not criticized, making him feel bad.
If another enjoys making love to children below five years of age, then he is just as normal as any man who only likes having sex with females over the age of physical maturity, when menstruation begins.
Because copulation did not evolve to reproduce a species, but evolve to give man pleasure, love, comfort...the entire uni-verse God's hug, now mankind's embrace.
Okay, some will say that species emerge when genetic isolation, over a long period of time, results in a gradual splintering, manifesting in a change of appearance, because appearance exposes essence....but we will not humour Nazis in our newfound self-loving, FU, ideology.
We reject this claptrap, and embrace, instead, the more pleasing ideology that all men are exactly the same, in potential, in essence, in every aspect of their being....we just others by the content of their character, and blind ourselves to how past/nature manifests as presence, appearance.

Beauty is in the ye of the beholder, and not an indication of genetic health, and resistance to parasites, producing more symmetry, and organ proportionality exposing fertility, or potentials.
No, it's all subjective.
And if a man likes obese females it isn't that he's sick in the head, compensating for something, but he is expressing his subjective appreciation for what is unfit, and infertile and asymmetrical, and disproportional.
Similarly, if another man likes being a mare to a big old stallion, or screwing chickens or cos, it's his subjective en-lightened darkening, that no longer accept the distinction of divisive criteria, like appearance, and the categories of species.
Species did not exist until man invented it, and then imposed it on all of us.
They, whoever they are, said so, as my guru teaches.
For more of this brilliant insight please visit ILP, where geniuses abound, to read the teacher's genius comments.
Learn to FU yourself, until the day you are released from a world you created.

FU self-loving, self-pleasuring, comes using may names, and is taught by many apostles.
Not only Iakob, the VO guru of the van-clan branch, but also cAnus the guru of nihilistic linguistics, masturbating using words, and reducing meat-minded objectivists to huffing and puffing...and let us not forget Ecmandu the apostle of suicide, and self-copulating, mental flatulence.
There are so many...and ironically many, or most, can be found on ILP.
Birds of a feather...return to the bird cage, the asylum of birth-brained flights to the heavens, inspiring us will with their chirps and tweets, and their feathery en-darkening lightness.
 

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-bristol-39118846

About time to call it quits in regards to calling the UK a Democracy noe, isn't it? This is behavior one expects from the Reich. They did nothing wrong, but police did wrong from enforcing a bad law.

That's not at root even religious tyranny, if it was, stop signs would have to be religious tyranny too. A religion can embrace rules it didn't originate on the basis of pragmatism. Christians inherit the anti-incest rules from roman law, and centuries passed in the nasty middle ages when the rule wasn't enforced, leading to absurd deformities like The Hapsburgh Jaw.



These mutations stack up pretty quick in a incestous population. You've ever seen retarded families, where both the mother and father are tards? Kids don't usually come out as intellectual superstars. They are left to find similarly **** up mates, and that just keeps building one generation after the next. Soon you have entire areas full of retards.

Nothing stops them, they got a incredible sex drive. Retards everywhere.

The reason why there is an age of consent is to protect children from adults. Because they are children they are
not deemed mature or responsible enough to make decisions for themselves. Now not every one matures at the
same age but you can not apply the law subjectively on a case by case basis and so it has to be the same for all

That is so closed minded it sickens me.
First off, it is ageism, and secondly it assumes that sex is some kind of violent, disgusting act, children must give consent to enjoy....like being forces to endure a massage, or a kiss, or  hug.

Sure it can be uncomfortable when someone you don't know hugs you, but you're to going to go crying to the police if it happens.

And it is also closed-minded speceism, as if animals cannot give consent using their own form of communication, as if only humans are permitted the privilege of consenting.
Give me a break.

What a bigot.
Open your mind, buddy....prepare for the inevitable, the coming New Age.
Be enlightened.
Grow up!